Ordinance Committee – Bike Lanes and Housing – Dec. 3rd-4th 2024

Have an opinion and want to share it? Contact the Council at council@cambridgema.gov. To be on the record, CC the city clerk at cityclerk@cambridgema.gov. Sign up to speak for public comment here.

December 3rd

Meeting Link

The Ordinance Committee will discuss amendments to the Cycling Safety Ordinance (CSO). The CSO requires that separated bicycle lanes and facilities be build across the city as roads are reconstructed. There is an additional requirement that certain major streets have “quick build” bike lanes installed by 2025. The proposed amendments will extend this deadline from May 2026 to to November 2026 on the following streets:

  • Broadway from Quincy Street to Hampshire Street
  • Cambridge Street from Oak Street to Second Street
  • Hampshire Street from Amory Street to Broadway
  • Garden Street from Huron Avenue to Berkeley Street, eastbound, and Garden Street from Mason Street to Huron Avenue, westbound

December 4th

Meeting Link

Source – presentation from last meeting

The Ordinance Committee will discuss zoning amendments to end “exclusionary zoning” by allowing the construction of multi-family housing city wide. All residential zones would be merged into a single zone and be subject to the same requirements and restrictions.

Current Zoning

Source: Cambridge CDD

Currently there are 12 residential zones that fall into one of three major types: single family A zones, two-family/duplex B zones, or multi-family C zones. C zones also include institutional uses such has universities. Multi-family homes can be as small as a triple decker or as large as a several story apartment building. Each zone also has restrictions on building height, size, footprint, and set-backs from the plot line. A type zones are the most restrictive with C type zones being the least.

Proposed Zoning

Source: Cambridge CDD

The proposed zoning changes aim to allow types of residential buildings and homes across the city as well as, “promote equity and consistency,” by using the same restrictions across all neighborhoods. To accomplish this, single and two family zones would be eliminated by converting A and B zones to C-1, which is the most common multi-family zone. Further, the requirements of C-1 would be changed to be more permissive of larger buildings to promote the construction of more housing. In brief these changes would:

  • Remove minimum lot sizes
  • Regulate based solely on open space and stories above grade instead of building size (FAR – floor to area ratio) and density (lot area per unit)
  • Allow up to 6 stories with a 75 feet height limit
  • Reduce or remove lot line setback requirements
  • Reduce or remove special permit requirements

Commercial buildings would still be subject to traditional regulation based on FAR

Mixed Use Districts

Source: Cambridge CDD

Currently, in business districts such as Inman Square, commercial buildings have stricter limits than purely residential buildings. The proposed zoning changes would promote these neighborhoods to be used use, allowing commercial buildings to use residential height allowances for the purpose of building more housing.

Variations

The city council requested that the CDD prepare five additional variations of the original plan for evaluation. These are the variations including the original.

  1. The original plan, which allows six stories city wide
  2. Four stories in current A and B zones six in C zones. Multi-family buildings will still be allowed in all zones
  3. Six stories for Inclusionary Zoning Projects only. All other projects would maintain the current zoning. A sub-variation of this plan would convert A and B zones to C-1 without modifying the zoning further.
  4. Four stories city wide and six to eight stories on select neighborhood streets: (e.g. Broadway, Prospect St, Huron Ave, Concord Ave)
  5. The original plan but with four stories instead of six
  6. Four stories city wide with an additional two stores for Inclusionary Zoning Projects.

All comments are from members of our comment team.

One response to “Ordinance Committee – Bike Lanes and Housing – Dec. 3rd-4th 2024”

  1. Charles J. Franklin Avatar
    Charles J. Franklin

    The CSO extension is a reversal in course from a council vote earlier which would have effectively delayed bike lane installation on those streets until 2017. The original vote to delay took place on April 8th, https://cambridgema.iqm2.com/Citizens/Detail_LegiFile.aspx?Frame=&MeetingID=4475&MediaPosition=&ID=22558&CssClass=. Although it would’ve been nice if the original deadline could’ve been reinstated, the city didn’t install some bike lanes this year as originally planned and now needs the extension to complete the lanes.

    On the zoning petition, I think either variation 3 or 6 is going to pass. There are fears that the original plan may lead to mostly market rate construction and further displacement, and Councilor Wilson has already indicated that she is unlikely to support a plan that doesn’t have Inclusionary requirements. Variation 2 is DOA as it continues to treat West Cambridge differently from the rest of the city. Most if not all of the ABC endorsed candidates, which make up a majority of the council, are unlikely to support such a plan. Variation 4 has a similar problem as it will focus housing construction in the eastern half of the city. Variation 5 is just the original plan, but less effective.

    I’ll gladly support either variation 1, 3 or 6. I like variation 6 the most because it both has requirements for inclusionary housing and brings many existing homes back into compliance with current zoning. Variation 3 will not do this. Although variation 3 will in theory produce more inclusionary units than 6, I feel that it’s important to bring existing buildings back into compliance. I believe it will also help to reduce projects that take an existing home with a large yard and prop up one or two skinny single family homes in its place. I’ve seen a lot of this type of construction in the neighborhood where I live, The Port. Those homes sell for $1,500,000+ and certainly don’t help with the housing crisis. Not every plot of land can support six stories and if we only allow construction of inclusionary projects then we’ll continue squeezing out middle income families and become a city of just the very rich and very poor.

Leave a Reply