Council Meeting – March 3rd, 2025 (Corrected)

Have an opinion and want to share it? Contact the Council at council@cambridgema.gov. To be on the record, CC the city clerk at cityclerk@cambridgema.gov. Sign up to speak for public comment here.

Meeting Link

City Manager’s Agenda

Reports and Communications

  • #1 (CMA 2025 #27) An update regarding Federal funding
  • #2 (CMA 2025 #28) A recommendation to replace the Cambridgeport School building roof
  • #3 (CMA 2025 #29) A report from the Supplier Diversity working group
  • #6 (CMA 2025 #32) The City Clerk’s office will be updating fees for the various services it provides

Appointments

  • #4 (CMA 2025 #30) Public Art Commission – Appointments: David Freilach, Rachel Dowley Alexander, and Chris Herlich. Reappointment: Kai Alexis Smith

Responses to Council Requests

  • #5 (CMA 2025 #31) To recognize and honor the Massachusett Tribe at Ponkapoag, the city will
    • “Hire a consultant to facilitate an educational training for the City Council and City staff to learn about the Massachusett Tribe and its history”
    • “Maintain and expand the working group of Indigenous community members and city staff”
    • Install a plaque with the text of policy order POR 2024 #145 in the lobby of City Hall

Policy Orders

Requests that the city…
  • #1 (POR 2025 #17) Explore potential actions the City can take to mitigate the impact of Eversource price hikes
  • #3 (POR 2025 #19) Coordinate with the MBTA in finding ways in which to strengthen safety measures
  • #4 (POR 2025 #20) Work with EZ Ride and Passio to fully resolve tracking deficiencies and improve real-time transit accuracy
  • #5 (POR 2025 #21) Develop language to create an “Affordable Rent Incentive Program” program for Cambridge
  • #6 (POR 2025 #22) Demand information from Eversource regarding the transformer explosion at 17 Edmunds Street on February 19
  • #7 (POR 2025 #23) Prioritize snow removal from crosswalks and pedestrian islands
  • #8 (POR 2025 #24) Draft a home rule petition allowing Cambridge to stop property owners from passing on broker’s fees to tenants
  • #9 (POR 2025 #25) Draft a zoning petition to the City Council for consideration on maximum unit size
  • #13 (POR 2025 #29) Create a plaque to be placed in City Hall to show that the Cambridge City Council upholds the separation of church and state and gender equality

That the council…
  • #2 (POR 2025 #18) Reaffirm that, “Cambridge is a Sanctuary City not only for immigrants but also for all marginalized communities, including transgender and nonbinary individuals”
  • #10 (POR 2025 #26) Go on record in support of HD.2996/SD.1305 An Act to Regulate Junk Fees in Housing and HD.238/SD.35 An Act Eliminating Forced Broker’s Fees
  • #11 (POR 2025 #27) “Urge the Executive Office of Health and Human Services and MassHealth to recognize BCaBAs for the purpose of reimbursement and implement a three-tier delivery model for ABA services”
  • #12 (POR 2025 #28) “Go on record supporting Teamsters Local 25 should they decide to take action, including extending picket lines to every Stop & Shop store in New England”

Applications and Petitions

  • #1 (APP 2025 #8) Temporary Banners – Lesley University – along Massachusetts Avenue between Everett Street and Upland Street
  • #2 (APP 2025 #9) Projecting Sign – Russell House Tavern – 14 JFK Street
  • #3 (APP 2025 #10) Curb Cut – Brinn Sanders – 177 Hancock Street

All comments are from members of our comment team.

2 responses to “Council Meeting – March 3rd, 2025 (Corrected)”

  1. Charles J. Franklin Avatar
    Charles J. Franklin

    My thoughts.

    POs 8 and 10: I strongly support both of these POs. Even if landlords move this cost into rent, at least it will be distributed across the year instead of being due all at once.

    PO 7: I generally support this, but the inclusion of the language about the CSO and bike lanes is confusing. I know of at least one person with an online following saying that it’s an attempt to blame bike lanes for snow obstructions to pedestrians. Perhaps this language should be shopped some?

    PO 9: I strongly oppose this PO. It’s overly prescriptive about what kind of housing can be built, which is how we found ourselves in a housing crisis to begin with. Such an ordinance could result in making it difficult to have a large family in the city. I know 2000 sqft seems like a lot, but that space quickly starts running out when you have kids. And I’m sure that there are other ways that this could backfire. I hate to be one of those people that says something should be sent to committee to be studied first, but I think that is warranted here. We just passed a major zoning reform. Let’s sit back and let it sink in before making this additional change, which may end up not being necessary. Just as we’ve said with multi-family housing, a bunch of mcmansions aren’t going to pop up overnight.

  2. Charles J. Franklin Avatar
    Charles J. Franklin

    Councillor Toner clarified that nothing in PO 7 is meant to imply anything negative about bike lanes

Leave a Reply